Audi TT prospective owner

Looking for a car for Mrs O, thinking out loud around a TT convertable. Sure there are some owners on here, what should I be looking for?

Fancy a V6 but suspect reliability may be an issue. 1.8 I suspect would be more practicle?

Items to avoid?

Quattro - yes/no ?

Any input, thoughts, critiques welcome.

TIA
 
Hi

I had a Mk 1 3.2 Dsg hard top , did around 60k miles , and was nice to look at , made good noises , but very unresponsive to drive , very nose heavy, with a tendency to head for the hedge , very small boot

Service history is top of the list , plus gear box oil /filter service , and parts are steep

Key points are timing chain, expected life span 80-160knand gear box after that it the normal stuff , I was quoted 2.9k for timing chain replacement, turned out it was the adjustment tensor which was stuck , managed to replace on the drive ... for 90.00

Lots of advice on the TT OC
 
What age / budget would be helpful for us who have owned TTs to help you? From experience:-

  • Avoid red on the Mk1 (lacquer peel)
  • Mk1 dash binnacles go wonky but can be sent away
  • Really not that much in it between the 180 and 225bhp versions unless you want to tune
  • convertible mk1 relays behind front headrests sometimes go (but roof otherwise ok.
  • 2.0 mk2 197bhp and 260bhp TTS both reliable if serviced properly. No problems with the ones I owned. Just be wary of higher mileage on DSG boxes and evidence of very regular gear oil
  • quattro? Mk1 most have. I don't see the point of getting one without it personally.
 
... Just ps / bhp differences I think. (272=268). Not sure about you but I found the TTS a bit jerky and rough edged. I did have a 2015 current gen as well but it had 19 inch wheels that killed the ride as we bounced across Spanish motorways on holiday once !

Anyway, back to the question there is so much choice of used TTs that I would go for one that is in looked after condition with a really good service history - hope that helps!
 
I have a modified Mk1 225 Quattro coupe. Cracking little sports car. I avoided the V6 as it is nose heavy and the 225 is plenty fast enough, but easily remapped if you like more grunt.

The factory changed the Mk1 front suspension to introduce oversteer, following a spate of high speed crashes, resulting in dull handling. Fit ‘Defcon’ bushes to transform the handling.

I also have a ‘black box’ on the Haldex 4WD system, which greatly improves torque and power distribution across and between the axles. A worthy mod.

The TT Shop is the go-to place for advice, mods and servicing. No affiliation, just a happy customer.
 
... Just ps / bhp differences I think. (272=268). Not sure about you but I found the TTS a bit jerky and rough edged. I did have a 2015 current gen as well but it had 19 inch wheels that killed the ride as we bounced across Spanish motorways on holiday once !

Anyway, back to the question there is so much choice of used TTs that I would go for one that is in looked after condition with a really good service history - hope that helps!

Yup had a solar orange mk2 tts loved the look but even on a stage 1 always found it flattered to deceive I think I actually preferred the mk2 197 tfsi...before I bought the ttrs . Had a mk3 tts but punted that in in Feb for a mk3 ttrs.

For me I didn't get on with the mk1 at all. Design icon yes, driving no. Really depends what you want out of the car but now you can pickup a mk2 197 which will easily remap to 260ish for 6k or even less. Really depends on budget but I do get that right now like the a2 the market has hit the bottom so prices are silly cheap unless you want something like a qs.
 
I have had a MK1 TT Roadster since new (import, 2001).
The MK2 is probably a better driver's car than the MK1 (although the steering is a bit too light and vague in my opinion) but personally I prefer the MK1 for both the looks and size although the MK2 has a neater roof folding mechanism. The MK2 is larger so if you are tall its the better option.

Engine wise, I would suggest that the 225 is a better bet than the lesser 1.8 versions as the engine itself is built much stronger. The 225 version is also better equipped with Xenon headlamps, 6 speed and DIS as standard.
4 cylinder vs. 6 cylinder would be a personal preference, the V6 sound is better than the 4 pot but worse fuel consumption and extra weight of the engine are negatives when the car is a bit too front heavy already with the 1.8.

Things to look out for on the MK1 Roadster.

The body should be generally good as it is galvanised although check the sills under the doors. Although they are non-structural, the underseal is thin, particularly at the front arches and stones can chip the paint and result in it looking cosmetically untidy. If there is rust on the body then its probably there because of accident damage. Note that the front wings and bonnet are aluminum for weight saving so won't rust. If the front wings are rusted then they are a non-OEM accident damage repair.
Check suspension arms for rust too, they can get bad if the car's been driven at winter on salted roads.

The car is relatively heavy so the suspension is worked hard. I would expect wishbone and ARB bushes to have needed to have been replaced by now (unless the car has had light use) so check for noises when driving.

Check that the soft top opens and closes properly (and quietly). If it has been used a lot, the microswitches can wear causing the mechanism to not think its fully open/closed when it is. The dash roof indicator should go out when the roof is fully open / closed. The hydraulic system is sealed and cannot be topped up in servicing. It doesn't need to be unless something has failed and the fluid has leaked so if the motor's struggling then repair is necessary.

Check for dampness in the passenger side compartment under the roll bar inside the car and the boot box under the roof. The roof relies on drain channels inside the car to allow any water to run out in front of the rear wheel arches. If these are clogged by dirt then the water overflows and runs inside the car when it rains.

The 1.8 should be reliable if serviced properly. Check that the oil changes have been done to spec and that the timing belt has been changed recently, if not, do it! An unmodified engine might be a better bet at not being worked hard! Listen to the engine and make sure you don't hear any exhaust blowing from the engine bay. The exhaust manifold has been known to crack so a sound of blowing could indicate a costly repair is necessary.

The dash instrument issues are well known. The most common fault if there is one is that the gauges don't read zero correctly when the power is on so the needle is "offset" upwards. This mostly affects the fuel / temperature but sometimes the speedo and revs too. A rarer fault is that the needles jump up and down on their own! You can check if the dash is OK when inspecting a car but I wouldn't worry about it failing as reputable repairers will be able to fix any fault for a fixed price. DIS LCD pixels dying is as any Audi of that era.

The sensors used by ABS system (acceleration and yaw) had reliability issues around this time. If they are going to fail, given the age of the car, they probably have done so and been replaced so if the ABS is working properly then its probably OK. They are easy to change, but not cheap.

As with any petrol car of this age, lambda sensors will fail as they have a lifespan. Again, if the car has been maintained properly and everything is working correctly, then this should be OK but if not, expect the engine light to be on! Make sure that the engine light itself works and hasn't been "disabled" to hide a fault!

Overall, look at condition and history. Good condition and well looked after with higher miles will probably be better than a lower mileage neglected car.

regards

Andrew
 
Thanks all,
I'm looking at cars in the region of 3k, Definately the Mk1, looks a neater car and the wife is only little so that doesn't matter.

I've been scouring the forums, like ours, problem cars get the headlines.

Will be looking at some cars early next week, up dates to follow.

Paul
 
Went to look at this one today, very local to me.
Autotrade Navy

Couple of little dents, curbed alloys and miss matched tyres. DIS lots of pixels missing. Hood nice and interior very tidy, plastics have lasted better on this than A2. Good history. Quite taken for a first look.
 
Happy with the colour? Just asking in case you are only likely to keep for a year and then sell on / part ex. If its going to be a forever keeper, then ignore me...
 
I’ve had mine a year today .
Gotta say it’s been a lot better than expected.
Lots of horror stories out there about reliability.
I’ve just needed a hazard switch/indicator relay and a coolant flange.
Mine 225 Quattro.
I’ve changed exhaust and air filter, just for some noise.
Oh and bare in mind, road tax is £335!!! ?
50674
50675
 
Happy with the colour? Just asking in case you are only likely to keep for a year and then sell on / part ex. If its going to be a forever keeper, then ignore me...

Although I like the Storm type colours, it is for the Wife, and as long as not silver or grey, requires something dark, so not may options. That Storm blue is a consideration.
 
Looking at some of the MOT history of those for sale, they seem hard on suspension (as @ajsellors ) mentioned. Also lots of mentions of brakepipes?

At the moment not really worth looking at on autotrader except a red in liverpool but has hidden reg (have asked for it)

This seems worthy of a look ? Ebay silver even though the colour not ideal
 
Be very careful with red !!! I knowingly bought a red convertible cheap with minor lacquer peel issues, and in the end had about 50% of it resprayed. I didn't lose any money on it when I sold it a year later., but be warned!
 
Back
Top