Take the head off yours, and you'll know what damage if any, has been done, which from your available performance data, seems likely to be be minor at worst. That engine's done a lot of revs since glow plug gate. Anything serious would have made itself known by now.What makes you think your current engine is kaput?
How many miles has it done since "glow plug gate"
Compression and injection seem to the major factors with the efficiency of the engine I would have said, which looking at those figures yours looks mint!
Granted having a replacement engine is never a bad thing, if your current engine isn't burning oil and turbo not noisy I wouldn't be too concerned but the insurance of a good lump to throw in sat waiting is bliss in my eyes!@Howey checked the MOT history and it has done 34k miles since glow plug gate.
@PlasticMac I'm looking for a replacement because mine is like this inside:
Bore pitting:
View attachment 113040
Bore pitting and erosion:
View attachment 113041
Bore scoring:
View attachment 113042
Piston crown damage:
View attachment 113043
Multiple bore pitting:
View attachment 113044
Combustion chambers too are messed up too but I can't find the picture. The problem I have, while accepted it is doing well, is I don't see how it's durability can't be compromised while in this state. Goodness knows what state the turbo turbine may be in, all that missing metal has passed through it.
Agree, it looks bad, but those pics are scaled up a bit. Otherwise, it looks good. Check the actual boost against requested, if there's turbo damage, you'll see it there, but you'd have felt it by now.@Howey checked the MOT history and it has done 34k miles since glow plug gate.
@PlasticMac I'm looking for a replacement because mine is like this inside:
Bore pitting:
View attachment 113040
Bore pitting and erosion:
View attachment 113041
Bore scoring:
View attachment 113042
Piston crown damage:
View attachment 113043
Multiple bore pitting:
View attachment 113044
Combustion chambers too are messed up too but I can't find the picture. The problem I have, while accepted it is doing well, is I don't see how it's durability can't be compromised while in this state. Goodness knows what state the turbo turbine may be in, all that missing metal has passed through it.
I think many others are thinking that way too, good to jave a lump in reserve. I’m sure there ate many good AMFs in garages waiting for the owners to realise they will never need them.Granted having a replacement engine is never a bad thing, if your current engine isn't burning oil and turbo not noisy I wouldn't be too concerned but the insurance of a good lump to throw in sat waiting is bliss in my eyes!
Yep that is the way I’m thinking. But as it still runs well I don’t feel the pressure to secure one and they keep slipping by.Agree, it looks bad, but those pics are scaled up a bit. Otherwise, it looks good. Check the actual boost against requested, if there's turbo damage, you'll see it there, but you'd have felt it by now.
Just seems a lot of expense, when, from MoT emmissions data, it in good health.
But, I can understand your doubts, and only a swap will restore your mind at rest.
Mac.
3.0 is default for turbo diesel engined vehiclesVery low emission ! But I note that your garage put the limit at 3.0 l/m - for the last few years the garages that I've been to have put 2.5 l/m as the limit. No problem for me but which is correct?
I had to google torsion value, no I don't set this. I'm not even sure my electronic box of tricks will measure it.With your current smoke test results superb, can I ask if you are a believer in the torsion value reading and have you set yours to any specific value?
It’s my job to cook Sunday lunch. But I parked the Merc on the garden and tidied up after the trip yesterday to collect the engine.I can say from experience of my engine swap, it's extremely rewarding! (Despite my turbo failing out of the blue)
Which leads me to say its well worth changing as many things as you can afford to for new or as new. The joy of working on and engine when it's off the car is a brilliant opportunity. I am sure you will though work so far seems very meticulous!
Look forward to the thread progress, great stuff and good luck.
Interesting this one, Ill post the details as I progress. The engine appears to have been manufactured early 2003 with the head being cast 2002 which is feasible.If this has been in an A2 how was the oil level sensor issue overcome with the original fabia sump?
Presume the fabia sump allows for the A2's dipstick extension piece?