For example, cruising on the motorway in 0.613 5th at 70mph will use about 8-10% less fuel than cruising at 70mph in the 0.75 5th as you can see from the BSFC map. On the other hand, if at 50 mph he is now in 4th instead of 5th, then MPG will drop due to the increase in RPM. So it very much depends on his exact driving conditions to whether his mpg will improve or drop (very much like the 5th gear mod which has similar trade-offs).
Thanks Mike, 10% will do for me
I would get an extra 30-40 miles for every tank!!
I love it. You've done your homework and are prepared to take a calculated risk that the JDD box will work for you. (The fatter torque envelope of your remapped engine should really help here)
As with other members who did the same with the first 6 speed and high 5th gear conversions and passed on their experiences, this is how the continuing development of the A2 progresses. Can't wait for the next instalment
Cheers Spike
Cheers Spike
I wish I had never asked now...
J
Why? Is it because your going to be £500 lighter?
It's clear that I have my doubts about the JDD per se as a workable solution, but to a degree I am playing devil's advocate. As Simon said, the A2OC is a sounding board for new ideas, and challenging ideas helps to separate the good ones from the bad. I do agree that Simon argues the case in favour very well, and I do hope this works out!
Tom
I agree Tom, if your idea cannot endure a little examination then it's not worth pursuing.
IMHO, there is a lot of potential in fitting the JDD gearbox into an A2
If you look the specs of the BlueMotion/Ecomotiv/Greenline VAG group cars (all using the JDD box).
You will see that they are heavier and have a higher aero drag than the A2's.
But they are using the same engines (with a few updated components, ECU etc)
These cars are touted as contemporary eco marvels (even beating the mighty Pirus at the eco stakes) and return as such, amazing MPG/emissions etc.
OK, they now have a few new tricks to eek out more MPG, like stop/start etc. But, we could do that too, with a twist of the right hand!
But weight saving/aero measures are always the first things you should look at, when trying to get more performance/economy (look at F1 car development).
We all know the A2’s weight/aero advantages, so in theory, the A2 with a current eco/longer gearbox could match the latest eco ‘green’ cars?
What I love about this:
If you were to go into a VW showroom and buy a BlueMotion with a similar spec to the Audi A2 SE, it would cost you nearly £17,000.
For that, you could walk out thinking you were a ‘green’ person and had just done your bit for the environment, and your wallet!
Or you could buy a ‘recycled’ A2 for a 1/7th of the price and with a few tweaks get similar running costs!
My bet is...the A2 will last longer and not to mention it's better looking too!
For all the people looking at alternative gearboxes that might fit the A2.
Here is a list of engine codes to check out AMF, BHC, BWB, AMS, BAY, BMS, BNV.
These engines with compatible(?) gearboxes are used in a lot of VAG group cars, here are some:
VOLKSWAGEN:
LUPO 1999-06 MODEL YEARS (6X/6E 3 CYLINDER) WITH ENGINE CODE - AMF
POLO 2000-02 MODEL YEARS (6N2) WITH ENGINE CODE - AMF
POLO 2002-05 MODEL YEARS (9N) WITH ENGINE CODES - AMF, BAY
POLO 2005-10 MODEL YEARS (9N3) WITH ENGINE CODES - BNV, BWB, BMS
SEAT:
AROSA 1997-04 MODEL YEARS (6H) WITH ENGINE CODE - AMF
CORDOBA 2003-05 MODEL YEARS (6L) WITH ENGINE CODE - AMF
CORDOBA 2006 MODEL YEAR ONWARDS (6L) WITH ENGINE CODES - AMF, BNV, BMS
IBIZA 2002-05 MODEL YEARS (6L) WITH ENGINE CODE - AMF
IBIZA 2006-2009 MODEL YEARS (6L) WITH ENGINE CODES - AMF, BNV, BMS
IBIZA 2009-10 MODEL YEARS (6J) WITH ENGINE CODES - AMF, BNV, BMS
SKODA:
FABIA 2000-04 MODEL YEARS (6Y) WITH ENGINE CODE - AMF
FABIA 2005-08 MODEL YEARS (6Y) WITH ENGINE CODES - AMF, BNV
FABIA 2007-10 MODEL YEARS (5J) WITH ENGINE CODES - BNV, BMS
ROOMSTER 2006-10 MODEL YEARS (5J) WITH ENGINE CODES - BNV, BMS
Please use as reference/starting point, do your research to check compatibility with your car.