Don't get me wrong, I love the 0.695 ratio. Longer fifth is one of the best mods I've got and I'd never go back, but we all know it's a compromise. I have to have one or the other, and I choose the 0.659 and would recommend it to those whom it would suit, but I have always understood why some (like Tony and Mike) have chosen to keep the gearing standard and others (like David) have decided upon a half-way-house.
Changing the 5th gear set came about as a result of researching a way of getting 6 gears, so was already a compromise before we'd really come to understand it. I'm not revolting against it, just voicing my enthusiasm for the ideal solution; both!
No, nobody seemed to be saying that there were any problems with their 0.659 gear then ... but now?
I might point out that it's you who's about to take out your 0.681 gear. I imagine that's because you've also found it to be a compromise.
The 0.681 just has its torque peak at different speeds. While cruising at 70mph, the 0.681 gear is already over the torque wave and will continue to drop off as you approach 80. The 0.659 ratio has roughly the same torque at 70mph, but on the opposite side of peak torque, so as you accelerate towards 80, the pull gets greater still. This obviously happens for the 0.681 at lower speeds, meaning you can change up earlier and peak torque is accessible at road-legal speeds. But, the 0.659 has further gains in fuel economy and reduced engine noise / long-term wear, which were its main attractions for me when I made my choice. For the driving I do at the moment, it's still the right choice of the longer 5th gears available, but, as Aidrian's example highlights, that may not always be the case. Similarly, if you were to make that trip to Italy in your A2 every month, you'd possibly want the 0.659.
Your gear set clearly suits you and is therefore the 'right' choice, but others have made their choice based on their priorities, which means they're also 'right'. It really is horses for courses.
Cheers,
Tom